[Local_activists] London GUARDIAN - election blog
MichaelP
papadop at peak.org
Tue Nov 4 12:46:36 PST 2008
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/oliverburkemanblog/2008/nov/04/uselections2008-barackobama5
Guardian blogg - Oliver Burkeman's campaign diary
< http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/burkeman>
Join me from 6pm eastern, 11pm UK time
Here we are at last. Tonight from 6pm eastern time, 11pm UK time I'll be
liveblogging election night here on this blog, for as long as it takes. (In
an earlier post I gave a different start time; I'll be here from 6pm/11pm.) My
colleague Daniel Nasaw has written an excellent guide here setting out Obama
and McCain's different potential paths to victory. Read it! And if you'll be
at an election night party -- an election night party where you're also
following my liveblog, naturally -- why not memorise parts of it in
advance, in order to sound immensely knowledgeable?
Our guideposts through the evening, of course, will be the poll closing
times; 6pm is closing time in solid red Kentucky and in Indiana, where an
Obama victory would be a sign of a landslide. Once a state's polls close, the
Associated Press and the main US television networks will use exit polls to
begin trying to make a call. In the most clear-cut cases, they'll call the
state based either on the exits or after comparing the exits with the very
first votes counted, but the closer the state, the longer they'll wait
before they're confident. In those closer cases, we'll have access to the
demographic data of the exit polls long before the state is called. There
are numerous reasons not to read too much into them, though they may
provide early clues to national changes in the electorate, and to the scale
of the predicted record turnout, along with the reality or otherwise of
such things as the Bradley effect and the cellphone effect. One of the
subsidiary fascinating questions of tonight is what criteria the AP and the
networks will use to call the election. Given the pitch of the excitement,
and the historic nature of the vote, everyone wants to be first. So despite
all the nervous memories of 2000, if we reach a time before the figures
are in from, say, California, Oregon and Hawaii, yet Obama seems to have
reached the 270 mark assuming those deep-blue states vote
Democratic, it's increasingly hard to imagine that the networks will wait
just to make sure McCain doesn't pull off some Alice-in-Wonderland
California victory. (There may, of course, be big differences in which
network calls the race when: Fox, not just in 2000 but in 2004 too, tends to
move with the most alacrity, or prematurity.) Of course, once we're in that
kind of situation, you can go to bed -- or go and get drunk -- confident of
the result even if the networks are still being coy.
I'll bring you every result until we know a winner, along with news of notable
developments in the races for the House and for the Senate, where the
Democrats are yearning for a "filibuster-proof" majority of 60 that would make
it far easier for a Democratic president to enact his proposals, though any
major boost from their current majority (51-49, reliant on Joe Lieberman)
would be a big help in that regard. I'll also bring you updates from our
excellent team of reporters in Chicago's Grant Park and elsewhere across the
country. The liveblog will begin as a single post; if it becomes unwieldy,
I'll close it up and direct you to a part two post, and so on as required.
Ladies and gentlemen: it's history in the making, and it's right here --
featuring beer, stream-of-consciousness commentary, links to other
stream-of-consciousness commentary and lots of Hard Data. I hope you'll
join the conversation and keep me updated on where you are in the world and
how people there are marking this extraordinary night. Or afternoon, or
morning, I suppose, depending on where you are. (Plus we have the Exciting
Election Contest!!! to adjudicate -- not that we need much more excitement.)
See you soon.
More information about the Local_activists
mailing list